Malta's Controversial Move: Shielding Gaming Operators from Foreign Judgments
The enactment of Bill 55 in Malta, signed into law this June, has stirred dissatisfaction among several European authorities. The law's provision, which shields Malta licensed gaming operators from foreign judgments, has raised concerns about its compatibility with EU regulations. The German gaming regulator (GGL) has openly criticized the bill, citing potential conflicts with EU law, and awaits the European Commission's stance on this contentious matter.
The implications of this new law are far-reaching, especially for players. With this law in place, seeking justice through local courts becomes an arduous task. Foreign court rulings won't hold sway within Malta's jurisdiction, rendering them unenforceable. As a result, players face the prospect of investing their time and resources in legal pursuits that yield no tangible results.
The motivation behind Bill 55 appears linked to instances where German and Austrian courts mandated operators under the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) to reimburse players for their incurred losses. These decisions were grounded in the operators' failure to possess local licenses while providing services, prompting Malta's move to safeguard its gaming operators from such judgments.
Linked materials
Our Conclusion
In light of these developments, it becomes increasingly evident that players in both Canada and Europe may face challenges when seeking legal recourse against casinos. The passage of Bill 55 in Malta serves as a striking example of how legislation can be wielded to protect gaming operators from foreign judgments, leaving players with limited avenues for pursuing justice through local courts. As the gaming landscape continues to evolve, it's essential for players to remain vigilant and informed about the legal frameworks that govern their interactions with casinos, understanding that the pursuit of justice through traditional channels may prove to be an uphill battle.
KingDestroyXD It’s great to see Sweden protecting its players! GG.bet has been known for lowering RTPs, and it’s a relief to see them off the market. We need more action like this to ensure a fair gaming environment!
ClosetClient I've been watching him for a long time, all these streamers are smeared with the same world. Changed his nickname and thinks that no one will notice? Lol. I myself once fell for such crap, I lost 4k in a week. Never again.
GoneDoners Finally a normal release from Hacks! Strength of Hercules with this feature of RotoGrid really refreshes the gameplay. Yesterday I went to x100 on the minimum, so I recommend it!
SlotsAmigo
SabineSchnabel SlotsAmigo Casino, a fresh entrant into the onli...
Pinco
SonjaFlint Pinco Casino offers an array of games from multi...
Trillionaire Megaways
JamesAllan Red Tiger’s Trillionaire Megaways is a dazzlin...
This legislation sets a concerning precedent by granting gaming operators immunity from foreign judgments. It feels like a step backward for consumer rights, as players are left without effective means to address issues and disputes with casinos.
It's disappointing to see the government passing laws that favor the gaming industry over the interests of players. This legislation effectively takes away our ability to hold casinos accountable and leaves us vulnerable to unfair treatment.
This new legislation seems like a blatant attempt to protect gaming operators at the expense of players' rights. It's disheartening to think that we might no longer have a fair chance to seek justice in cases of disputes with casinos.