Ontario Casino Dealer Charged with Colluding with Patrons
A recent case of gambling-related misconduct has emerged as a table games dealer from Pickering Casino Resort in Ontario faces charges for allegedly engaging in collusion with players. The Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) reported the incident, explaining that on August 3, 2023, their Enforcement Bureau received allegations regarding a casino employee's involvement in assisting patrons to secure wins.
Following the received signals, an investigation was promptly initiated with the collaborative support of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario. This thorough inquiry ultimately led to the apprehension of four individuals suspected of colluding at Pickering Casino Resort. The four accused parties are now confronted with criminal charges and are slated to appear in court at a later date.
Multiple Charges Including Fraud

According to the official report, Sandeep Sogi, a 24-year-old resident of Toronto, is the central figure in this illicit activity. Mr. Sogi is charged with criminal breach of trust, and in addition to this, he is facing four counts each of cheating at play and fraud over CA$5,000. As defined by the Criminal Code, cheating at play involves an intention to defraud others.
Sandeep Sogi was not acting alone in these activities. He was accompanied by Sukhvir Singh, a 28-year-old from Mississauga; Deepak Kakkar, a 30-year-old from Brampton; and Anchhu Kumar, a 24-year-old also hailing from Brampton. These three individuals collectively face charges of cheating at play, fraud over CA$5,000, and possession of property originating from crimes over CA$5,000.
OPP Declines Further Details
While the OPP acknowledged the case's existence, they refrained from divulging specific details regarding the alleged collusion method and the total sum of money involved in the fraudulent activities. These details are expected to emerge during the court proceedings when the evidence is presented before a judge.
The four suspects have been released from custody, and their upcoming appearance in an Oshawa courtroom is anticipated. Since the investigation is ongoing, the OPP has appealed to anyone with pertinent information to come forward and assist their investigators. The exact court date for the suspects is yet to be determined.
A String of Gambling-Related Crimes
This incident is not the first of its kind this year. Earlier, the OPP had reported another case involving a dealer collaborating with patrons. In that instance, five individuals were arrested, including an employee from Woodbine Casino in Toronto. The accused individual, 52-year-old Arthur Segovia, faced charges including criminal breach of trust, cheating at play, theft over CA$5,000, and fraud over CA$5,000.
Additional instances of gambling-related crimes have also come to light. One such case involved a 27-year-old woman, Abigail Aseani Lindsay, from Toronto, accused of orchestrating a lottery scam targeting seniors in Alberta and Manitoba. Lindsay faced charges of defrauding the public over CA$5,000 and two counts of possession of property obtained through criminal means.
Our Conclusion
In our reality, the perception often lingers that only casinos hold the power to amass profits while potentially deceiving their clientele. However, it's worth considering that even a casino's strategies can falter when dealing with cunning individuals. In this intricate landscape, attempting to outwit those well-versed in the art of deception can prove to be a complex endeavor.
Linked materials



ravenmilkers If Black Cube is really just an operator, then who spent money on such a large-scale operation? It doesn't cost 5 kopecks.



BatBulo4ka 5 thousand a day - well, this is no longer a player, but some kind of investor. It is quite reasonable to limit it.



CertifiedNiggur And then they wonder why the players are paranoid... Even dealers can no longer be trusted.


ImBrainless Damn, how sick these casinos are with their blocks! I had a situation in the pin-up, just when a big win was shining - 8k. And what do you think? They blocked the under the pretext of "suspicious activity". Two months of correspondence, and only after threatening to write to the regulator, the money was returned. Now I check 100 times where I go. Thank you for the article, a relevant topic!
