KSA Imposes €19.68 Million Fine on Gammix, Company Deems It "Absolute Joke"
On February 29, the Dutch Gaming Authority, KSA, levied a hefty €19,679,000 fine against Gammix Limited for offering its services to players in the Netherlands without proper licensing. This marks the second time the company has been penalized by the regulator, following a €4.4 million fine in June 2022 for similar violations. Despite previous sanctions, the KSA asserts that Gammix has failed to rectify the issue.
KSA Ruling
According to the KSA, Gammix Limited's casino websites did not implement measures to prevent players with Dutch IP addresses from accessing their platforms. An employee managed to create an account and deposit funds, with the registration process even offering the Netherlands country code '+31'. Additionally, the Netherlands was not listed as a restricted territory in the casino's terms and conditions.
Gammix Response
In response to the fine, Gammix Director Phil Pearson expressed disdain, referring to the penalty as "an absolute joke" and indicating plans to appeal. The company contends that the account in question was created from Luxembourg and accuses the regulator of using falsified data.
Gammix has formally lodged an objection, asserting that they actively block Dutch IP addresses and do not intentionally target Dutch players. However, they dispute the KSA's estimation of €19,679,000 in turnover from Dutch players, deeming it unrealistic and erroneous.
ravenmilkers If Black Cube is really just an operator, then who spent money on such a large-scale operation? It doesn't cost 5 kopecks.
BatBulo4ka 5 thousand a day - well, this is no longer a player, but some kind of investor. It is quite reasonable to limit it.
CertifiedNiggur And then they wonder why the players are paranoid... Even dealers can no longer be trusted.
ImBrainless Damn, how sick these casinos are with their blocks! I had a situation in the pin-up, just when a big win was shining - 8k. And what do you think? They blocked the under the pretext of "suspicious activity". Two months of correspondence, and only after threatening to write to the regulator, the money was returned. Now I check 100 times where I go. Thank you for the article, a relevant topic!
Book Of Tribes Extreme
JamesAllan Step into a mysterious world of ancient power ...
Olympus Lightning
PaulJefferson Step into the realm of ancient gods in Olympus...
Nightmaker
JamesAllan ELK Studios steps into darker territory with N...
Fishin’ Frenzy Even Bigger Catch 2
PaulJefferson Blueprint Gaming returns to the open waters wi...
Gates of Hades
JamesAllan Gates of Hades by Pragmatic Play takes players...
I'm curious to see how Gammix plans to defend its position in the appeal process. While the fine is undoubtedly significant, it's essential to consider all perspectives before passing judgment. Hopefully, this incident prompts greater collaboration between gaming companies and regulatory authorities to uphold industry standards and ensure a fair gaming environment for all.
The ongoing dispute between Gammix and the KSA underscores the complexities of regulatory oversight in the gaming industry. While fines serve as a deterrent, it's essential for companies to proactively address compliance issues to avoid reputational damage and further penalties. Transparency and cooperation with regulators are key to navigating such challenges.
It's disappointing to see companies prioritize profits over compliance with gaming regulations. The safety and well-being of players should always come first. Gammix's failure to implement adequate measures to prevent Dutch players from accessing their sites is unacceptable and reflects poorly on the integrity of their operations.
Wow, that's a hefty fine! Gammix must be feeling the pressure now. It's clear that regulatory bodies are cracking down on non-compliance, and companies need to take their obligations seriously. Let's see how this plays out in the appeal process.
Gammix's response to the fine raises some interesting points about jurisdiction and data accuracy. However, the burden falls on the company to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, regardless of where accounts are created. The discrepancy in turnover estimates highlights the need for transparency and accurate reporting in regulatory matters.