Arkansas’ Online Gambling Bill: A Bad Deal for Players
Arkansas lawmakers are pushing to legalize online casinos, but players shouldn't expect anything good from it. If history is any indication, the government will take the most restrictive approach possible—high taxes, strict regulations, and a terrible return-to-player (RTP) rate that could drop as low as 80%.
House Bill 1861, introduced by Rep. Matt Duffield and Sen. Dave Wallace, aims to let the state’s three licensed casinos—Saracen, Oaklawn, and Southland—offer online blackjack, roulette, and craps. The stated goal? To crack down on offshore gambling sites. But in reality, this means less competition, fewer choices for players, and even worse odds.
The bill also opens the floodgates for more gambling ads, ensuring that betting promotions will be everywhere—leading to a surge in gambling addiction. Lawmakers argue that legalization will generate tax revenue and fund universities, but it's clear who the real winners are: the casinos and the state, while players get squeezed with worse payouts and more restrictions.
Meanwhile, unlicensed offshore sites are being demonized, with Arkansas threatening felony charges for operating without a state license. This isn’t about protecting players—it’s about shutting down competition so the state’s approved casinos can profit even more.
If this bill passes, Arkansas gamblers will face tighter restrictions, worse odds, and non-stop advertisements. The government gets richer, the casinos get more control, and players? They get the short end of the stick.
ImBrainless Damn, how sick these casinos are with their blocks! I had a situation in the pin-up, just when a big win was shining - 8k. And what do you think? They blocked the under the pretext of "suspicious activity". Two months of correspondence, and only after threatening to write to the regulator, the money was returned. Now I check 100 times where I go. Thank you for the article, a relevant topic!
Spartan113 Informative, thanks to the author! Now I will know that this has happened. The lesson for the future is to check everything three times.
MisterM1mba One thing is clear – if the software is buggy, then it is a casino problem. Why should a player suffer?
Yukiiihira The coefficient for the passage of the Villa is almost 10! I took it purely for fun, you never know, suddenly like Barca once.
o0oSoyao0o Well, soon there will be not only skyscrapers in Dubai, but also Book of Ra slot machines.
Retro Trader
JamesAllan Retro Trader by BGaming isn’t your typical onl...
Jumbo Safari
PaulJefferson Reel Kingdom takes a break from its fishy adve...
Pray for Three
JamesAllan In a genre teeming with tired themes like joke...
Casinos win, the state wins, and we lose. If they really wanted to protect players, they’d focus on fair odds, not just locking us into their system.
Regulation is fine, but if they set terrible payout rates and increase taxes, what’s the point? Players will still look for better alternatives, legal or not.
Funny how they suddenly care about ‘illegal’ gambling when it means they’re losing money. Instead of giving us better options, they’ll just make it illegal to play elsewhere.
More gambling ads? Just what we need—constant promotions trying to lure in new players while the state takes a cut from every bet. This will only make problem gambling worse.
They say it’s about 'protecting consumers,' but it’s really about making sure only their casinos profit. Offshore sites at least offer better odds—now we’re stuck with whatever scraps they give us.