Gambling Revolution: Why Do Casinos Introduce Games with a Fair 100% RTP?

The gambling market is being hit by a wave of really healthy competition, and this is great news for players.

The pioneers were the guys from Duel Casino, who were the first to decide to introduce games with a return to player (RTP) of 100%. It was a very bold step that simultaneously declared a protest against all other casino projects. After all, in fact, the site voluntarily gave up its mathematical advantage and put competitors in a precarious position.

A few months later, the market reacted. In order not to lose the audience, two more major players, Metawin and Gamdom launched their own lines of games with a "zero" house edge (Zero House Edge).

What is the point? There are no marketing gimmicks or "mythical" 98% here. It's a real 100% (or as close to it as possible). The math is simple:

• In the long run, the casino does not earn a penny in such games.
• The player, accordingly, does not lose anything at the same distance.

A logical question arises: what is the catch and why is this casino? The answer lies in retention. It is more profitable for sites to give the player a "free" attraction so that he stays within the ecosystem of the project than to let him go to competitors.

Let's compare the example of the popular game Plinko. The logic of the choice is obvious:

1. Why spin Pragmatic Play's Plinko where the RTP is only 97.5%?
2. What's the point of choosing Hacksaw Gaming with their 94.3% to 98.98% floating returns?
3. And even Stake Originals with their 99% now look faded.

... when there is already Duel or Gamdom on the market offering the same Plinko, but with an RTP of 100%.

There are more and more such games, and this is a great trend. The industry is turning to the player, forcing providers and platforms to moderate their appetites.