Michigan Supreme Court Decides Fate of $3 Million from BetMGM: Who Is Right – Player or Casino?
The Michigan Supreme Court is considering a high-profile case that could change the rules of the game in the state's online gambling. We are talking about a conflict between a player and a large operator BetMGM, where nothing less than $3 million is at stake.
How it all began
The story began back in 2021, when Detroit resident Jacqueline Davis claimed to have won more than $11 million by playing Luck O' the Roulette online roulette on the BetMGM platform for five days in a row. According to her, the balance gradually decreased to $3 million, after which she tried to withdraw the remaining amount.
BetMGM soon issued a statement that the winnings were due to a technical error in their software. The casino declared the victory invalid, citing a "glitch" that allegedly artificially inflated the payouts.
Who should decide: the court or the regulator?
The situation went beyond the usual dispute between the player and the platform. The case moved to the legal plane and rested on the main question: does the player have the right to sue the casino in a civil proceeding, or should all such disputes be resolved by the Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB), the body that oversees gambling in the state?
The lower courts sided with BetMGM. They referred to the Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA), which gives MGCB exclusive authority in such matters.
But Davis' lawyer disagrees. He argues that her claims (including allegations of fraud and breach of contract) are based on common law and do not conflict with LIGA in any way.
MGCB unexpectedly supported the player
The most interesting thing is that in the course of the proceedings, MGCB filed a statement where it actually confirmed that they really do not have the resources and mandate to settle private lawsuits like Davis. This surprised the Supreme Court justices, causing serious doubts: how is it that the law seems to have transferred powers to you, and you yourself admit that you cannot use them?
BetMGM Position
For its part, BetMGM claims that it acted strictly according to the rules. According to the user agreement, the platform has the right to void bets in the event of technical failures. In addition, Davis allegedly filed a complaint with MGCB, but did not wait for an official response before going to court.
Why it matters
This case could set a precedent – it will determine whether players will be able to take legal action against casino operators in the future, or whether their complaints will be permanently stuck in the MGCB. The court's decision may also define the boundaries between administrative regulation and civil rights in the online gambling industry, which is only gaining momentum in Michigan.
The final decision of the Supreme Court is expected within a year.
tickscollar All this bullshit was invented to squeeze out the last money. It used to be easier - bet on red, win or lose. And now some chickens are running, airplanes are flying... Circus.
xSuiZ The article is fire! Everything was laid out according to the facts. Drake is not a ludomaniac, he is a walking advertisement. And while the suckers believe in his "curse", Stake rakes in the money. Beautiful, you can't say anything. I've been riding a steak myself for a year now, I threw in crypto and generally don't give a about all the blocking.
Leoak Finally a good article on NC! I've been playing them since the very beginning, since the first Deadwood. Yes, their dispersion is crazy, you can lose a deposit in 100 spins. But when he pours ... It's worth it. In Mental x15k I caught, I still remember this spin. The whole point is in their x-mechanics, they really change the game, and not just for show.
tealblossom 2 minutes to respond? Yes, this is a dream! Otherwise, while you wait for these operators, you will already want to play. It's high time!
New Slots Spotlight: 23 Jun – 01 Jul
xYoloStrafe I wasted all my salary on The Luxe. Beautiful, of ...
Your Complete Guide to Payment Methods for Gambling in Canada (2025)
ofavionik Some kaziks still accept e-Transfer, you just need...
Has anyone read the agreement? They have black and white — if there is a bug, the money is not paid.
Hardcore. I can imagine what it is like to think that you have won millions, and then you don't care.
It's strange that $100k was given without question. Does it mean that at least something has been admitted after all?
yes, "glitch", of course. As soon as the win is big, there is a mistake. It smells rotten.
One thing is clear – if the software is buggy, then it is a casino problem. Why should a player suffer?