Trainwreck called Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming slots a "lottery", while Nolimit City was the only chance to win
Popular casino streamer Trainwreck in one of his recent videos spoke quite harshly about the slots Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming. According to him, playing them is like participating in the lottery: you need an almost infinite balance to ever catch the maximum multiplier. According to the streamer, decent winnings in these machines are very rare.
At the same time, he singled out Nolimit City slots, stating that it is in them that there is a real opportunity to reach the maximum payouts. However, it is worth understanding the context of such statements. Such words of Trainwreck are more reminiscent of well-worked advertising within the framework of a new partnership contract with Nolimit City. Yes, their slots do have more "sharp" payout profiles and the chance to reach the maximum is higher, than many other providers, but solely due to various mechanics of buying a bonus and other features. Streamers do not have objective and open statistics on the market.
In addition, Nolimit already has a reputation as a company that actively pays for promotion: often, within a few hours after the release of a new slot, large and maximum winnings in this game begin to "pop up" en masse in the streamer environment. Therefore, you should not blindly believe the videos of millionaires — this is primarily content, not reliable analytics.
Trainwreck is no longer a streamer, but just a showcase for advertising slots. You can watch it only with irony.
The statistics on millions of spins are what is really interesting.
Pragmatic, on the contrary, often gives out decent series
+1, Sugar Rush saved more than once. But in San Quentin - empty as in space.
And I don't understand the point of these comparisons at all. Any slot is random. Lottery or not - what difference does it make.
I've played Nolimit — yes, it can be hard to pile up.
But it drains just as well. So fairy tales about the "only chance" are bypassed.